AMICOR Medicina

This Blog, is one of a set of AMICOR instruments of communication, where I use to refer relevant material I select for myself, making it also available for my colleagues and friends. The main blog address is http://amicor.blogspot.com This one is specific for medical education. To see more information on compliance with the Health On The Net Foundation's initiative (HONCode) visit http://achutti.blogspot.com

My Photo
Name:
Location: Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Coordinator of the list AMICOR. Friends and colleagues, mostly from Brazil. The AMICOR list is where I use to post relevant scientific material I find surfing in the INTERNET. Also references sent by other member of the list.

Tuesday, November 23, 2021

Rheumatic Heart Disease Prophylaxis

 ORIGINAL ARTICLEFREE PREVIEW

Secondary Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease

List of authors.
  • Andrea Beaton, M.D., 
  • Emmy Okello, Ph.D., 
  • Joselyn Rwebembera, M.Med., 
  • Anneke Grobler, Ph.D., 
  • Daniel Engelman, Ph.D., 
  • Juliet Alepere, B.A., 
  • Lesley Canales, B.A., 
  • Jonathan Carapetis, Ph.D., 
  • Alyssa DeWyer, B.S., 
  • Peter Lwabi, M.Med., 
  • Mariana Mirabel, Ph.D., 
  • Ana O. Mocumbi, Ph.D., 

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease affects more than 40.5 million people worldwide and results in 306,000 deaths annually. Echocardiographic screening detects rheumatic heart disease at an early, latent stage. Whether secondary antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing progression of latent rheumatic heart disease is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of secondary antibiotic prophylaxis in Ugandan children and adolescents 5 to 17 years of age with latent rheumatic heart disease. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either injections of penicillin G benzathine (also known as benzathine benzylpenicillin) every 4 weeks for 2 years or no prophylaxis. All the participants underwent echocardiography at baseline and at 2 years after randomization. Changes from baseline were adjudicated by a panel whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. The primary outcome was echocardiographic progression of latent rheumatic heart disease at 2 years.

RESULTS

Among 102,200 children and adolescents who had screening echocardiograms, 3327 were initially assessed as having latent rheumatic heart disease, and 926 of the 3327 subsequently received a definitive diagnosis on the basis of confirmatory echocardiography and were determined to be eligible for the trial. Consent or assent for participation was provided for 916 persons, and all underwent randomization; 818 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, and 799 (97.7%) completed the trial. A total of 3 participants (0.8%) in the prophylaxis group had echocardiographic progression at 2 years, as compared with 33 (8.2%) in the control group (risk difference, −7.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −10.2 to −4.7; P<0.001). Two participants in the prophylaxis group had serious adverse events that were attributable to receipt of prophylaxis, including one episode of a mild anaphylactic reaction (representing <0.1% of all administered doses of prophylaxis).

CONCLUSIONS

Among children and adolescents 5 to 17 years of age with latent rheumatic heart disease, secondary antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the risk of disease progression at 2 years. Further research is needed before the implementation of population-level screening can be recommended. (Funded by the Thrasher Research Fund and others; GOAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03346525. opens in new tab.)

Read this article and use 1 of your 1 remaining free subscriber-only articles.

Supported by the Thrasher Research FundGift of Life InternationalChildren’s National Hospital Foundation (Zachary Blumenfeld Fund and Race for Every Child [Team Jocelyn]), the Elias–Ginsburg FamilyWiley ReinPhilips FoundationAT&T FoundationHeart Healers International, the Karp Family FoundationHuron Philanthropies, and the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Heart Institute Research Core.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

Drs. Beaton and Okello contributed equally to this article.

This article was published on November 13, 2021, at NEJM.org.

data sharing statement provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

This article is dedicated to the late Professor Bongani Mayosi, an original investigator of the GOAL trial. Professor Mayosi was a mentor, colleague, and friend who inspired and guided rheumatic heart disease research as part of his life’s work toward a more equitable future for Africa and the world.

Author Affiliations

From Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine — both in Cincinnati (A.B.); Uganda Heart Institute (E.O., J.R., J.A., P.L., M.N., E.N., I.O.O.), and the Department of Medicine, Makerere University (E.O.) — both in Kampala, Uganda; Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC (L.C., M. Murali, R.S., C.A.S.); Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (A.G., D.E., A.C.S.), and Melbourne Children’s Global Health, Royal Children’s Hospital (D.E., A.C.S.), Melbourne, and Telethon Kids Institute, Perth Children’s Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth (J.C.) — all in Australia; Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA (A.D.W.); Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, and Cardio-Oncologie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou — both in Paris (M. Mirabel); Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique (A.O.M.); Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (M.C.P.N.); Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (A.S.); Green Lane Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Service, Starship Children’s Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand (N.W.); Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (M.Z.); the Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital — both in Cape Town, South Africa (L.Z.); and All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India (G.K.).

Dr. Beaton can be contacted at  or at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229.

Monday, May 07, 2007

Portal sobre História da Medicina

De: Sergio Luiz Bassanesi [mailto:sergio.bassanesi@ufrgs.br]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 7 de maio de 2007 23:05
Para: Maria Inês Reinert Azambuja
Cc: aloyzio.achutti@terra.com.br

Inês:
Dá uma olhada neste link. É sobre o prédio da FAMED.
http://www.sbhm.org.br/index.asp?p=noticias&codigo=107
Bassanesi

Friday, December 29, 2006

Physicians in opera--reflection of medical history and public perception -- Willich 333 (7582): 1333 -- BMJ

Physicians in opera--reflection of medical history and public perception -- Willich 333 (7582): 1333 -- BMJ
Music plays an increasingly important part in medicine, such as in specific care for performing artists.1 But what about the representation of medicine in music?
A systematic search in theatrical reference books yielded 40 operas from three centuries in which physicians appear on stage (see table on bmj.com). I selected several operas as specific examples in the history of opera. I analysed the role and function of the physician in different categories including the character and importance of his role, his function and basis of knowledge, and his social status. I also looked at the historical context.
Eighteenth century
Opera developed in the late Renaissance and early Baroque.2 There are no doctors in the operas of Monteverdi, Gluck, or Handel, partly because the stories are often based on material from mythology or antiquity. In the 18th century, however, our colleagues enter the stage.
Le Nozze di Figaro (The Marriage of Figaro, premiered 1786) is one of Mozart's great operas. Among the secondary characters is Dr Bartolo, a physician who does not appear in his role as a healer. He is angry with Figaro and threatens to take revenge on him for having once helped to abduct his ward Rosina, who Bartolo wanted to marry. Towards the end of the opera, however, Dr Bartolo sides with Figaro after finding out by chance that Figaro is his lost son who had been abducted as a baby. /.../

What stays constant at the heart of medicine -- Cook 333 (7582): 1281 -- BMJ

What stays constant at the heart of medicine -- Cook 333 (7582): 1281 -- BMJ: "There is no one division of medicine by which we know and another by which we act

The expression 'the science and art of medicine' is much misunderstood. Too often the parts of medicine termed as its 'art' seem to amount to no more than good communication skills or to what was once called a good bedside manner. No doubt patients feel better, and perhaps even do better, when they think their doctor cares about them. But stories also abound of well dressed doctors with smooth manners but little knowledge who have gained—and sometimes abused—the trust of their patients.

While the historical record is replete with such examples, and almost every practitioner will be able to call others to mind, it is the fictional creations of writers such as Molière, Shaw, and Cronin that have most amused and scandalised us. To provide a counterweight to such social frauds, all kinds of programmes and regulations have been introduced to make competence and knowledge more important to professional advancement than manners, social graces, and public regard.

But to identify the art of medicine with 'artfulness' is to fall into a set of modern confusions. It is now common to think of art as something done by artists and the arts as a different field of activity than science, sometimes even "

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Scientist charged in ethics case - baltimoresun.com

Scientist charged in ethics case - baltimoresun.com: "A senior government scientist working in Alzheimer's disease research was charged by federal prosecutors yesterday with accepting $285,000 in consulting fees and travel expenses from the world's largest drug manufacturer without proper approval from his bosses.

The criminal case emerged as a rare example of a top leader in the sciences being accused of breaking the law over a breach of professional ethics.

Leaders at the National Institutes of Health and their overseers in Congress have described the private financial arrangements between drug companies and publicly employed scientists as the worst scandal in the history of the agency.

Pearson 'Trey' Sunderland III, chief of the geriatric psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health, which is part of the NIH, was charged yesterday with conflict of interest. He is accused of accepting payments from Pfizer Inc. without authorization from his superiors and ethics watchdogs. The misdemeanor charge was filed by criminal /.../"

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Educating Health Professionals about Drug and Device Promotion: Advocates' Recommendations

PLoS Medicine - Educating Health Professionals about Drug and Device Promotion: Advocates' Recommendations: "This Health in Action provides recommendations for improving education for health professionals about pharmaceutical and device promotion, which includes any activity that can increase sales of pharmaceuticals or devices. The recommendations were produced by an iterative E-mail discussion among representatives of four organizations: the American Medical Student Association, Healthy Skepticism Inc., No Free Lunch, and PharmAware (Box 1).
We hope these recommendations will inform, stimulate, and support educators of health professionals to develop improved education about pharmaceutical and device promotion. We will survey educators to seek their views on these recommendations.
Background
In the promotion of rofecoxib (Vioxx), “drug marketing got well ahead of the science” [1]. The successful hormone-replacement-therapy marketing campaign “convinced physicians that so called HRT [hormone-replacement therapy] prevented cardiovascular disease before one single clinical trial with cardiovascular disease end points had ever been done” [2]. These are just two examples of how misleading promotion can be a major threat to health [1,2].
There were an estimated 88,000–140,000 excess cases of serious coronary artery disease attributable to rofecoxib in the United States alone [3]. The number of women harmed by severe adverse effects of hormone-replacement therapy, including breast cancer, may have been even larger because hormone-replacement therapy was used for longer, but we are not aware of any reliable estimate. Reforms are needed to reduce the risk of similar events occurring again [4].
The US Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education states that “residents must learn how promotional activities can influence judgment in prescribing decisions and research activities through specific instructional activities” [5]. World Health Assembly resolution 52.19 urges member states to “integrate the rational use of drugs and information on commercial marketing strategies into training for health practitioners at all levels.” However, a recent worldwide survey of education about pharmaceutical promotion in medical and pharmacy schools found that “in most cases &mldr; students devoted one half day or less to this topic during their professional training; in nearly one third of cases, medical faculties devoted only 1–2 hours” [6]. That survey also found wide variations in objectives, ranging from aiming to “increase students' ability to extract beneficial information from drug promotion” to aiming to “increase students' use of independent information sources."

Saturday, September 30, 2006

American Medical Education 100 Years after the Flexner Report

Ovid: Cooke: N Engl J Med, Volume 355(13).September 28, 2006.1339-1344: "Medical education seems to be in a perpetual state of unrest. From the early 1900s to the present, more than a score of reports from foundations, educational bodies, and professional task forces have criticized medical education for emphasizing scientific knowledge over biologic understanding, clinical reasoning, practical skill, and the development of character, compassion, and integrity. [1-4] How did this situation arise, and what can be done about it? In this article, which introduces a new series on medical education in the Journal, we summarize the changes in medical education over the past century and describe the current challenges, using as a framework the key goals of professional education: to transmit knowledge, to impart skills, and to inculcate the values of the profession."/.../

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Changing the Face of Medicine

Changing the Face of Medicine: "Discover the many ways that women have influenced and enhanced the practice of medicine. The individuals featured here provide an intriguing glimpse of the broader community of women doctors who are making a difference. The National Library of Medicine is pleased to present this exhibition honoring the lives and accomplishments of these women in the hope of inspiring a new generation of medical pioneers."